This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
If There is No God... (debate)
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
blademeld
Yes, in your world, but you don't live alone, you live in a community. I should think.
And other people will judge you based on your actions.
You should do whatever you want, but you have to balance it with the consequences of your actions.
Post by
MyTie
Yes, in your world, but you don't live alone, you live in a community. I should think.
And other people will judge you based on your actions.
You should do whatever you want, but you have to balance it with the consequences of your actions.
Aren't imposed consequences just guides put in place by authority, who have come to the conclusion of right and wrong based on opinions just as flawed as mine?
Post by
Malgayne
This is a bit of a flame-bait thread, intentionally or otherwise. But I'm curious to see where it goes, because I think MyTie and I have the same underlying assumptions about the universe—and the result in both cases is an extreme opposite viewpoint.
The point of MyTie's question is not to propose what would happen if world government collapsed as a simple thought experiment. The point, I believe, is this:
Some people believe in God, and some people don't. No surprise there. But nearly everyone believes that some sort of universal code of ethics or morals, like "doing things which hurt other people = bad" exists. Most believe that governments (and sometimes regular people) have the ability and the responsibility to enforce this code.
So if there's no God, does that mean there's no code, and everyone decides for himself what's right or wrong? Or is there a code? And if so, who decides what it is, and how do you know they've got it right?
This is fundamentally a religious debate, about the nature of God and about the nature of ethics. Debates like this are EXTREMELY likely to offend people, especially when they take place on forums. This is a test. I like to think that we're mature enough to handle this without taking personal shots at anybody. If we can't, this thread will get locked so fast your head will spin, and further debates will be curtailed.
Good luck.
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
blademeld
Aren't imposed consequences just guides put in place by authority, who have come to the conclusion of right and wrong based on opinions just as flawed as mine?
In a dictatorship, yes. In a democracy, in idealism, the authority is placed by us according to our ethics.
Also, laws are based on examples and practises, even if they aren't perfect, that is, it's impossible to please everyone, it is a base guideline that we can abide by. If a country's laws aren't to your liking, simply leave the country.
If you want a country where murder is right, good luck surviving the next 5 minutes of your new government.
Post by
182246
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
172996
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
Aren't imposed consequences just guides put in place by authority, who have come to the conclusion of right and wrong based on opinions just as flawed as mine?
Even in a community with no gov't, they will still have social values and morals. If you break them and can't conform to what is socially acceptable, I'm sure you'll be removed.
Yes, that probably is the case. So, where did that society get their rules? Opinion?
My entire point, is that
right and wrong is just opinion
. Whether that is opinion of society, government, religion, the individual, etc. There is no scientific test to set out and prove what is right and is wrong. We also can show that popular opinion isn't always the best, such as Nazi Germany. So, what makes me right? If it is just opinion, then why do I do anything to be right? If nothing I do is right for anything but opinion, then why should I do anything? What is the point of living? What is the point of dieing? What is the point of it all if it is simply arbitrary opinion that will be completely forgotten in a few generations? It is just for instinctual pleasure? That seems trivial.
Edit: @Zap - So we agree that right and wrong is something conjectured from opinions? See above.
Post by
182246
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
blademeld
We also can show that popular* opinion isn't always the best, such as Nazi Germany.
Disclaimer:
*Popularity may change with region and race.
If it is just opinion, then why do I do anything to be right?
You don't have to do anything, your opinion is yours alone.
If nothing I do is right for anything but opinion, then why should I do anything? What is the point of living? What is the point of dieing? What is the point of it all if it is simply arbitrary opinion that will be completely forgotten in a few generations? It is just for instinctual pleasure? That seems trivial.
So are we at "what's the purpose of life" now?
42.
Post by
MyTie
Why does there have to be a predetermined "point" to life? In the vastness of space, everything we do is trivial. Why does that matter?
So, if we have come to the conclusion that there is no point, because space is vast, and right and wrong are opinion, then what happens when we introduce the possibility that there is a God?
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
182246
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
307081
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
Ok. I think I asked all the questions I wanted to, and hit all the points I wanted to make. /exit
Post by
172996
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
334295
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Malgayne
I already gave my example on Nazi Germany. Well they may have been the majority in Germany, they were the minority when compared to the rest of the world. That's why we went to war.
Just look to history for examples, like the halocaust. Nazis thought it was right to eliminate what they deemed lesser races, and most of the rest of the world said that's not right, and there was a conflict.
Out of curiosity, are you proposing that if majority opinion had been that there was nothing wrong with what the Nazis were doing and that it was acceptable for the Jews to be exterminated, then that would have made the Holocaust a morally good and righteous thing?
Post by
blademeld
Morally, no, ethically, yes.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.