This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
A Question for All of you Climate People (Now about Other Stuff!)
Return to board index
Post by
L33tsauce
Except it's that one kid who is color blind, and not the rest of the world.
I thought I established quite clearly that the tree is a tree. Why do you think it's a firetruck?
I'm in your thread,
Owning you with your own extended metaphors.
Post by
ASHelmy
Evolution is a theory with scientific evidence supporting it. The bible is a book written thousands of years ago, and you don't even really know who wrote it.
It has no more credibility than the Koran. And yet somehow islam is wrong, but your christianity is right. You said it yourself, you go to a christian school. You've been practically brainwashed your entire education to think that your religion is right. It's not any more correct or any more plausible than any other religion--which is to say it isn't plausible at all.
Why do you think public funded schools aren't allowed to be religious? Religious school is what they do in extreme religious fundamentalist societies. Face it Queggy, you're woefully uninformed in so many areas, as made evident by many of the things you've said lately.
I beg to differ. I
dare
you to find
one
mistake in the qu'ran. Do not speak non sense you know little about, mate.
Scientific errors related to embryology are contained in the Koran. In 86:6-7 the Koran says, "He is created from a drop emitted- Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs". This echoes the scientific error of Hippocrates who believe semen originates from all the fluid in the body, starting from the brain down the spinal chord, before passing through the kidneys and finally the ********* into the *****
$5.00 please.
What is this? It is a well known fact that the qu'ran was one for the first to describe how a baby was formed accurately. I am not sure about the details, but I have never heard the stuff you're saying before. Not everything on the internet is right, so don't just copy paste :S.
Post by
123022
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Laihendi
Except it's that one kid who is color blind, and not the rest of the world.
I thought I established quite clearly that the tree is a tree. Why do you think it's a firetruck?
I'm in your thread,
Owning you with your own extended metaphors.
Except Laihendi is person 1, who saw the tree and declared it for what is was. Person 2 ignored the logic and evidence and said it was a firetruck.
Person 1 and 2 see the same thing. Person 3 sees something else.
Persons 1 and 3 both identify the object based on what they see. Person 2 just denies what he sees.
Post by
Queggy
How so? Is there a superiority in one of them? Do they coincide without superiority? They obviously can't coincide without dealing with each other at certain points...
If they work together than they can cancel out each other.
Post by
L33tsauce
Except it's that one kid who is color blind, and not the rest of the world.
I thought I established quite clearly that the tree is a tree. Why do you think it's a firetruck?
I'm in your thread,
Owning you with your own extended metaphors.
Except Laihendi is person 1, who saw the tree and declared it for what is was. Person 2 ignored the logic and evidence and said it was a firetruck.
Person 1 and 2 see the same thing. Person 3 sees something else.
Persons 1 and 3 both identify the object based on what they see. Person 2 just denies what he sees.
Except that Person 1 didn't actually see a tree, he saw a platypus. He just claimed it to be a tree, because both he and Person 2 are silly twits.
Although what I was referring to was my colorblind story. I clearly established that the world was colorblind (tree), you said the colorblind one was the child (firetruck).
I wasn't meaning for this to actually describe the world. It just servers to show you that, if everyone thinks that what's wrong is right, then when someone knows what's right, everyone will tell him he's wrong. Hence, you think
I'm
the blind one.
Edit: Oh, and Person 3 never claimed to see anything. He existed for no reason, other than to provide a humorous /facepalm at the end.
Edit 2, 3: I makes teh sillay mistakez.
Post by
Skyfire
How so? Is there a superiority in one of them? Do they coincide without superiority? They obviously can't coincide without dealing with each other at certain points...
If they work together than they can cancel out each other.
Try again. I asked how, not what happens when they do. And I disagree with that conclusion anyway, but that wasn't the original question.
Post by
ASHelmy
Evolution is a theory with scientific evidence supporting it. The bible is a book written thousands of years ago, and you don't even really know who wrote it.
It has no more credibility than the Koran. And yet somehow islam is wrong, but your christianity is right. You said it yourself, you go to a christian school. You've been practically brainwashed your entire education to think that your religion is right. It's not any more correct or any more plausible than any other religion--which is to say it isn't plausible at all.
Why do you think public funded schools aren't allowed to be religious? Religious school is what they do in extreme religious fundamentalist societies. Face it Queggy, you're woefully uninformed in so many areas, as made evident by many of the things you've said lately.
I beg to differ. I
dare
you to find
one
mistake in the qu'ran. Do not speak non sense you know little about, mate.
Scientific errors related to embryology are contained in the Koran. In 86:6-7 the Koran says, "He is created from a drop emitted- Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs". This echoes the scientific error of Hippocrates who believe semen originates from all the fluid in the body, starting from the brain down the spinal chord, before passing through the kidneys and finally the ********* into the *****
$5.00 please.
lahendi, you are either trolling or kidding. If you are not, then you best be ready for what's coming, cause I iwll show you how wrong you are...
Edit: fixed a mistake.
Post by
Queggy
How so? Is there a superiority in one of them? Do they coincide without superiority? They obviously can't coincide without dealing with each other at certain points...
If they work together than they can cancel out each other.
Try again. I asked how, not what happens when they do. And I disagree with that conclusion anyway, but that wasn't the original question.
How they work together? I'm not sure what you're asking.
Post by
Laihendi
lahendi, you are either trolling or kidding. If you are not, then you best be ready for what's coming, cause I iwll show you how wrong you are...
Edit: fixed a mistake.
?
Post by
Skyfire
How so? Is there a superiority in one of them? Do they coincide without superiority? They obviously can't coincide without dealing with each other at certain points...
If they work together than they can cancel out each other.
Try again. I asked how, not what happens when they do. And I disagree with that conclusion anyway, but that wasn't the original question.
How they work together? I'm not sure what you're asking.
No, you said the word "together". I asked about their status relative to each other, what it means to have both coexisting at the same time.
Post by
Queggy
Well if you have the government reporting on itself and a third party reporting on the government and then having a third-third party looking over both then you might possibly eliminate most errors.
Post by
L33tsauce
Laihendi has yet to make a reply to my previous comment. Does that mean I win? Where's my cookie?
Post by
Laihendi
Except no one wants religion looking over government, because that would be a theocracy.
Post by
123022
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skyfire
Except no one wants religion looking over government, because that would be a theocracy.
You fail. That's not where I'm going at all.
Well if you have the government reporting on itself and a third party reporting on the government and then having a third-third party looking over both then you might possibly eliminate most errors.
Ok, so who is this third-third person, and why should we trust them?
Post by
ASHelmy
lahendi, you are either trolling or kidding. If you are not, then you best be ready for what's coming, cause I iwll show you how wrong you are...
Edit: fixed a mistake.
?
I am referring to the the fact that the thing you quoted was from a site called bible.ca or something, blatantly biased towards the bible. I, a mere 16-year-old, was able to find many mistakes in the things they claimed, just skimming through quickly.
I am bored of this thread, I will just say something before I leave, we are all insignificant, in 500 years we will all be forgotten. But the qu'ran will live on, unchanged. 5000 thousand years from now, some people are gonna have the same discussion will are having now. The bible will live on too, but will probably be changed more and more.
p.s: I have nothing against Christians, I have a lot of christian friends whom I get along with fairly well, it is just that you guys asked what was wrong with it, and i pointed it out.
Edit: you want to debate, fine with me, just don't say that the qu'ran is wrong.
Post by
Laihendi
Just because it's a site about the bible made by christians doesn't mean it favors one religion over the other.
Post by
ASHelmy
Ok then, let us pretend for second that it is not biased, it still has mistakes, and a single mistake is enough to make the whole thing unreliable.
Post by
Queggy
Just because it's a site
about the bible made by christians
doesn't mean it
favors one religion over the other.
/facepalm
Ok, so who is this third-third person, and why should we trust them?
I don't know that's the problem. Some people could obviously be trusted and others couldn't. I suppose it would have to be a small handpicked group.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.