This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please
enable JavaScript
in your browser.
Live
PTR
Beta
Classic
TBC
QOTD Thread #332- Do you think that people should keep cats outdoors?
Return to board index
Post by
Xedosz
Aquarius
Post by
Adamsm
Saggitarius.
Post by
Interest
Did the thread somehow get shorter?
I think my sign is Libra, though I don't really....care...
Post by
Rankkor
october 11, you tell me. I've never really paid much attention to the zodiac signs. Its either Libra or Scorpio, not really sure.
Post by
Monday
Did the thread somehow get shorter?
I think my sign is Libra, though I don't really....care...
Now that you mention it...
Post by
MyTie
I deleted my earlier post because it wasn't a very productive post.
Further, I looked up the actual answer. Apparently I'm a gemini. I don't know what that means, though. I don't believe it means anything.
Post by
Interest
I deleted my earlier post because it wasn't a very productive post.
Further, I looked up the actual answer. Apparently I'm a gemini. I don't know what that means, though. I don't believe it means anything.
I mean like 10-15 pages got deleted though.
Post by
Lombax
I deleted my earlier post because it wasn't a very productive post.
Further, I looked up the actual answer. Apparently I'm a gemini. I don't know what that means, though. I don't believe it means anything.
It means that you're a dubstep producer.
Post by
MyTie
I mean like 10-15 pages got deleted though.
Wow.
Post by
FatalHeaven
Aquarius.
Post by
204878
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheVorago
I'm fervently against horoscopes and all that birth-sign nonsense. Sure it's on the more harmless end of the whole hand-wavey psychic sham hogwash spectrum but it's still a system where people are allowed to make money by exploiting the credulity of others.
It's
not
cool.
Son I am dissapoint. As a good scientist you should take the stance of your intellectual ancestor Isaac Newton and be humble and open to mysteries of the world you have not studied and lack any insight into. Scepticism is good, fervent rejection of anything you deem unscientific is foolish and unworthy. I have studied astrology at depth for 15 years and I can say it is a deeply interesting subject.
Pisces, but I don't believe in all the hocus-pocus that goes with it.
Cancer, and neither.
you may not, but no doubt in the world that those young eyes are moon-child eyes.
Post by
ElhonnaDS
#109- Are you a risk taker? In general, do you tend to play it safe, or take risks? Why, do you think?
Post by
gamerunknown
Scepticism is good, fervent rejection of anything you deem unscientific is foolish and unworthy
Not really. Rejection of unscientific concepts has saved a lot of money, a lot of lives and lead to interesting research such as the Forer effect.
109. I suppose I'm avoidant. I read a conservative commentator that said the main difference between conservatives and progressives are that progressives do not want to take risks and want to minimise the costs involved with taking risks. Conservatives want to maximise gains from risks. In a zero sum game, that tends to produce non-Utilitarian results. One person can only be made so happy with ownership of lots of stuff. Many people can be significantly better off owning something rather than nothing.
Post by
EluraE
I thought the question said "Are you a rice stalker?". I am.
If I'm risk taker or not I've never really thought about.
Post by
Patty
I don't take a lot of risks but then go on to regret not being more risky. The risks I
do
go for usually backfire though.
Post by
fenomas
Son I am dissapoint. As a good scientist you should take the stance of your intellectual ancestor Isaac Newton and be humble and open to mysteries of the world you have not studied and lack any insight into.
I'm afraid that the pointless non-disciplines that Newton wasted much of his life on were alchemy and theology, not astrology. Even in Newton's day scientists had largely spurned astrology and Newton was no different.
Post by
donnymurph
I am a considered risk taker, ie I weigh up the pros and cons of taking certain risks before I take them. There's being bold, and then there's being stupid.
Sometimes I do things impulsively though, and funnily enough they usually end well.
I thought the question said "Are you a rice stalker?". I am.
If I'm risk taker or not I've never really thought about.
You say you've never had a job and rarely go outside, so I'd be inclined to think you aren't.
Post by
pikeyboy
It depends. In most areas of life, I'd say yes. I'd risk sleeping in the rain for the sake of a brilliant week long hike. I'd risk sleeping in a car, and a parking fine, for the sake of excellent music. I'd risk leaning in for a kiss, and also telling somebody that I love them. I'd risk leaving familiar things behind for something new and different. I've done all these many times.
I would not use a chainsaw without the proper safety gear, and another person present. I wouldn't drive an uninsured vehicle. I wouldn't take a drug if I didn't know what was in it. I wouldn't leave my 3000 quid concertina on a pub table while I went for some chips.
I take the hazards into account. What are the possible consequences of my actions? The risk is the probability of it happening. Is the hazard worth the risk? Then I can decide whether to take the risk.
Post by
EluraE
I am a considered risk taker, ie I weigh up the pros and cons of taking certain risks before I take them. There's being bold, and then there's being stupid.
Sometimes I do things impulsively though, and funnily enough they usually end well.
I thought the question said "Are you a rice stalker?". I am.
If I'm risk taker or not I've never really thought about.
You say you've never had a job and rarely go outside, so I'd be inclined to think you aren't.
Not having a job doesn't mean I'm not a risk taker, it means I don't have the need for a job and I'm lazy.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.
© 2021 Fanbyte
