This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
UGH (Featuring immoral and stupid harm to defenceless animals)
Return to board index
Post by
Lusky
Oh, but considering you assume we can live without animals, even though they have assisted us in evolving and living everywhere, looking back even at caveman drawing have been depicted killing animals for food and clothing (maybe on the clothing, crazy hairy nudists), I got a little interested.
Even the native Americans who have the most respect for nature killed for meat and hide.
I just don't get it.
Post by
blademeld
It's still relative, the guys were using the hedgehog to improve their aim.
In their view, it's not meaningless.
LOL
Of course, this is not to say that most of the members of society within my relative region would agree to this statement.
Post by
Lusky
I gotta agree with vikey on this one, Lusky called names first.
I did, and it was uncalled for, sorry if I've had a bad day, but I'm not apologizing.
Also, before I get comments on my opinion, I'm no MyTie, and I usually don't try and share opinions because I'm also a bad at explaining my own.
Post by
blademeld
Oh, but considering you assume we can live without animals, even though they have assisted us in evolving and living everywhere, looking back even at caveman drawing have been depicted killing animals for food and clothing (maybe on the clothing, crazy hairy nudists), I got a little interested.
Even the native Americans who have the most respect for nature killed for meat and hide.
Simple, the counterargument is that it's no longer necessary.
Post by
149406
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
85162
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
blademeld
I did, and it was uncalled for, sorry if I've had a bad day, but I'm not apologizing.
I think the main point is that you're being a hypocrite, not the fact that you've called names, but w.e. it wasn't directed at me.
I didn't say we can live without animals, I said we can live without
mindlessly
killing them. I know we
can't
live w/o animals.
again, relative.
Post by
Lusky
We can live without fur.
We can live without meat.
Wut?
Where does meat come from?
Now, I'm not all for savagely beating an animal to death to gain its meat and fur.. I'm against torture of animals, too.. but, god they are so delicious.
Post by
149406
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
115147
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
blademeld
Eh, I came here looking for random silliness. Woe to me for being in a serious discussion.
I know eh, I'm almost considering reporting this thread, kek.
Post by
149406
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
blademeld
or you can come to the IRC (which I'm not on atm)
Post by
315859
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
blademeld
Let me make myself clear if I havn't.
I think killing animals for
no reason at all
is bad
I think killing animals for fur, meat, leather, killing by testing and things of that nature is very bad.
I think hunting is bad, I see no fun in killing a defenseless fawn that is trying to survive from bears already in a forest...
But things like
self defense, and things that fall into that category
are fine. If I'm being attacked by a bear and I had a gun I'd shoot it.
I'm not that close minded.
Vikey, again, that's all relative.
Post by
149406
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Lusky
its a small furry animal
Not the way I use in. Unless you use it to describe blademeld in bed . . . >.>
Blademeld is no longer allowed to post his opinion in here. ;)
Post by
blademeld
If a dog bites you for teasing it with a piece of meat, is that self defense or harassment to the animal?
By the law it's both, I'd call it harassment.
Post by
blademeld
I meant killing the animal for self defense in a
life or death
situation. Not a bite or a scratch, in that situation you could just leave the animal alone. I'm talking about being mauled to death by a bear.
Again, relative, what if the bear was sniffing a person whose dog was eaten by the bear and the person panicked so much and truly believed that his life was threatened that he killed the bear?
The case scenario is always perspective.
Post by
211590
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.
