This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
If the Pandaren became playable, would you play one?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Atik
My bad.
But that looks a LOT like a badger. Similiar head shape with a clear distinction between it and the rest of the body, ect.
Post by
Adamsm
You can say that about any animal if you really want to. The Furbolgs have a bear base though, as that's fairly obvious; the sunken head and neck, the overly large shoulders, the thick bodies, and the claws that match the paws. Badgers...not so much; they are another
mustelidae
, and share the characteristics with them; hell, badgers look like giant weasels on steroids who got scrunched up.
Post by
FarseerLolotea
Pandas are bears. Raccoons are close kin to bears. Badgers, as Adams pointed out, are specialized weasels.
As to whether or not I'd play a pandaren: it depends on how they were handled. I'm fairly indifferent to the general idea of pandaren.
Post by
WTBaggrodump
Gentlemen,
chill
.
Wolvar ftw!
If not, then I stick with my liking to the Panderan. But that's mostly because I'm a big WC3 fan. :3
Post by
138638
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Ahrendel
Grade A necro.
Post by
gnomerdon
sorry, but GNOME MONKS seem to strike me harder.
Post by
Interest
Grade A necro.
Well to be honest, I think the thread may still be relevant.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.