This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
If the Pandaren became playable, would you play one?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
367020
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
WTBaggrodump
Aww... the name Kungfupanda is already taken... guess I'll just go with Kungfupandar.
Unfortunately, the character limit for names is 11. That name is 12. :X
Nope, it's 12
Either you're incorrect or they bumped up the character limit while I've been away since 4.0 dropped. It's always been 11. Soylentgrey, my Shammy, was at the max character limit. It's 11 characters. >>
Post by
588530
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
91604
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
lankybrit
Yep, I would play any new class in this game.
Cheers.
Post by
Jubilee
Either you're incorrect or they bumped up the character limit while I've been away since 4.0 dropped. It's always been 11. Soylentgrey, my Shammy, was at the max character limit. It's 11 characters. >>
That's not the case. It's been 12 since at least the beginning of Wrath, presumably before as well. I know this to be true because two of my characters have 12 letter names, and I've had them for that long.
Post by
206732
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
211100
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Interest
Aww... the name Kungfupanda is already taken... guess I'll just go with Kungfupandar.
Unfortunately, the character limit for names is 11. That name is 12. :X
Nope, it's 12
Either you're incorrect or they bumped up the character limit while I've been away since 4.0 dropped. It's always been 11. Soylentgrey, my Shammy, was at the max character limit. It's 11 characters. >>
Nope, it's been 12 since vanilla. My paladins name is
dropkicmurfy
I'm shippin' up to Boston?
Post by
OverZealous
To be honest, I'm surprised there aren't more people voting "No", since judging from the Blog Post, almost everyone seemed to be against adding the Pandaren.
Post by
484937
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Atik
only if they look cool like the ones that samwise drew.
They won't.
Blizz refuses to let a race look cool. When everyone loved the worgen models, they went and changed them.
Post by
minad
Panda is anymal. And hes not human. Means he is like stupid and not controlbable. I think all need to be human or humanoid. So i think i say no. And pandas are new thing to warcraft and i dont think they are there.
Post by
Gnub
Panda is anymal. And hes not human. Means he is like stupid and not controlbable. I think all need to be human or humanoid. So i think i say no. And pandas are new thing to warcraft and i dont think they are there.
Tauren (and Worgen, if we keep them in their wolf-form) would like a word with you. And Tuskarr. And Tol'vir. And Taunka. And ...
Post by
OverZealous
Panda is anymal. And hes not human. Means he is like stupid and not controlbable. I think all need to be human or humanoid. So i think i say no. And pandas are new thing to warcraft and i dont think they are there.
Tauren (and Worgen, if we keep them in their wolf-form) would like a word with you. And Tuskarr. And Tol'vir. And Taunka. And ...
And thunder gnus?
Post by
Axyn80
Pandarians would be the ultimate trolling class.
Your main issue is being the fact that they would be a race. And trolls are the trolling race... or they were. Unless you've entered my realm's trade chat. Shut the f*** up gnomes.
Post by
WTBaggrodump
Aww... the name Kungfupanda is already taken... guess I'll just go with Kungfupandar.
Unfortunately, the character limit for names is 11. That name is 12. :X
Nope, it's 12
Either you're incorrect or they bumped up the character limit while I've been away since 4.0 dropped. It's always been 11. Soylentgrey, my Shammy, was at the max character limit. It's 11 characters. >>
Nope, it's been 12 since vanilla. My paladins name is
dropkicmurfy
SONOFABIT- I've always been playing with the mindset that the max was 11. I could
swear
that it's 11 characters. I can't find out for myself until I get back into the game. I've always been pissed that you're stuck with so few characters... I could of made so many awesome names in that time... ;~;
P.S. I still don't know for certain, but two against one, what can I say? I'm sorry@koa999
Post by
Swekaka
No, they look silly on the artwork so they will look even more silly in-game.
Post by
Adamsm
No, they look silly on the artwork so they will look even more silly in-game.
Um...what about the Furbolgs, the Pandaren cousins?
Post by
Levarus
The Pandaren will most likely not be introduced as a neutral playable faction. I'm sure Garrosh Hellscream would instantly kick the Pandaren out of the Horde since there would be others within the Alliance.
And how confusing would that be in Battlegrounds to the noobs who don't know how to press Tab, Blizzard will receive sooo much complaints. And plus, if they were going to make a neutral faction they would of done it in Cataclysm adding the Goblins to both the Horde and Alliance.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.