This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Garrosh set it up
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
423967
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
46491
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
FarseerLolotea
First thing I thought was "Garrosh set us up the bomb."As did I.
(Captcha is "of cruelest.")
Post by
104395
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
http://thoriumbrotherhood.net/file.php/1/2739/cat_mulgore_baine.jpg
We already know that Garrosh accidentally killed Cairne.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Thrall himself calls Garrosh "the new warchief", now if garrosh somewhat staged a grand conspiracy theme to somehow get the title without Thrall's permission, why on earth would Thrall recognize his title?
I've told you a thousand times already, Thrall IS the warchief, Garrosh is only an ACTING warchief.
Rank, you just put a double stnadard the the argument itself in this.
I'm said what I believe is the only logical explanation to all this. Given how when you the goblin player gives Garrosh the note, his face goes pale. The released info pretty much confirmed that Garrosh set up Thrall being captured. And Thrall himself would have more then likely figured this out, and for the time being, playing along. Thats why he called garrosh Warchief, because he knows what Garrosh did to claim his title from him.
And again, the conversation with vol'jin is nothing more then Garrosh claiming what happened, when he could simple be using a half truth with vol'jin.
you are right though. I do fear the idea of Garrosh remaining as warchief. You know how much a love the horde only because of Thrall and what he did to make it what it is now, not some lord of the rings rip off, but, well, This horde. I do not mind things being shaken up, but the thing I'm fearing is how as they develop Garrosh more and more, it makes more fans like him, and lessens the idea of if the horde needs Thrall after all, and even ultimately pushes him into the background all the more.
And so far, I've not gotten anything to confirm otherwise. Except that phased in and out Throne. But regardless, we know now anything ingame can now be phased, since thats what has happened to old world azeroth.
It also just makes he see red, that Thrall would tell the trade prince that Garrosh IS the new warchief, without anything more to it. You are an optimist in this Rank, I however am just trying to set myself up for a bad fall.
Post by
Adamsm
I'm said what I believe is the only logical explanation to all this.Right, your opinion, not a fact.
Post by
taurenmoo812
I'm said what I believe is the only logical explanation to all this.Right, your opinion, not a fact.
I'm using evidense based on whats already been said. Try reading the rest and form a more constructive argument if you wish to.
Post by
Adamsm
As this says:
Garrosh is the "acting" Warchief of the Horde. Implying "temporary." Everyone breathe a sigh of relief.So yeah, sure you can imply what you want from that small section, where it doesn't give the full thing, but you can also figure things out from other information released as well. So yeah sorry, but it's too early to go running and screaming into the house with 'The Sky is falling!' when we don't have all the information. Also, whatever you argue, is tainted by your belief that everyone and anyone who supports Garrosh is an idiot and a moron so yeah....
Post by
Rankkor
Given how when you the goblin player gives Garrosh the note, his face goes pale. The released info pretty much confirmed that Garrosh set up Thrall being captured
nope, the released info confirms that garrosh found it incredibly disturbing that SI:7 insignia, now that could have a billion diferent meanings, from "SI:7 has agents among the horde, that's how they knew I was gonna be traveling" to "you were the one who tipped them off" to "the alliance just tried to assassinate me"
there is nothing to "confirm" that garrosh was behind Thrall's abduction, there's only a "hint" of it, while it does seem plausible what you say, it's still not confirmed.
And again, the conversation with vol'jin is nothing more then Garrosh claiming what happened, when
he could simple be using a half truth with vol'jin
.
exept that in that conversation, Vol'jin didn't pulled any punches, he really gave a very epic "reason you suck" speech to garrosh and voiced just about everything he disliked about him, there was nothing holding the tounge of Vol'jin back.
If Vol'jin suspected that garrosh was never appointed as Warchief by Thrall himself, he would had said so then and there, but since he didn't that means Vol'jin was there to see the apointment in person.
besides we have yet to see said ceremony taking place, I highly doubt Thrall would go to an important mission and apoint a new warchief in secret, I bet you 100 bucks he does a public speech to the people of orgrimmar, and we're gonna see that speech and ceremony in the pre-cata events.
even if somehow garrosh tipped off the SI:7 about the location of thrall, one thing is certain, Garrosh's apointment as Acting Warchief is legit.
you are right though. I do fear the idea of Garrosh remaining as warchief, and I'm fearing is how as they develop Garrosh more and more, it makes more fans like him
and again I've provided you with a solid evidence that his time on the throne isn't permanent, his chair isn't solid, it's phased.
And so far, I've
not gotten anything
to confirm otherwise. Except that phased in and out Throne.
o_O how about that direct statement from the makers of the lore that he's an acting warchief only? that in the press release of june 8 to all the press members who attended they told them that he is an Acting warchief?
bro' add 2+2 please.
Statement that their plans are for garrosh to be acting warchief+Throne wich is not a permanent part of the world like the thrones of the other permanent leaders=Leader wich is subject to change at any moment.
it really doesn't take a genius.
(or does it? o_O)
Post by
coolguyry
You know Basik Kampfire wouldn't throw that dude off a cliff. He'd give him third-degree burns instead! Fire makes a much better leader! Destruction to the enemy!
Post by
558249
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
541095
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
104395
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5NgCbvZrl8k/TDC6THE9-xI/AAAAAAAAAYA/FfUQovwXVzE/s1600/gallywix+leader.png
Thrall declares Garrosh is the new Warchief, for what it's worth.
That already got said earlier on. And again, This could just well be Thralls method of keeping Garrosh sweating, knowing full well he's taken complete control of the horde and arranged Thrall to be captured, Thralls just playing along.
Post by
SirPunky
Day after day I see how Tauren transforms in Lupine.
The End Is Nigh
Post by
462750
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.