This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Iran
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Skreeran
As for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I agree that it was wrong, but don't you start thinking that Japan was any better as far as acts of war go..A few hundred killed at Pearl Harbour against a few thousand from the two cities......Try Nanking and Unit 731, bro.
Post by
R1TeR
America isent the only country there
Great Brit, Aus, Can, Saudi Araba, Japan(think they pulled out tho)
Post by
Adamsm
As for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I agree that it was wrong, but don't you start thinking that Japan was any better as far as acts of war go..A few hundred killed at Pearl Harbour against a few thousand from the two cities......Try Nanking and Unit 731, bro.
Pearl Harbour was what pulled the Americans into the Second World War; if they hadn't of been attacked, the States probably would have continued their SOP for wars at that ear; sell to both sides and profit.
Post by
Skreeran
As for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I agree that it was wrong, but don't you start thinking that Japan was any better as far as acts of war go..A few hundred killed at Pearl Harbour against a few thousand from the two cities......Try Nanking and Unit 731, bro.
Pearl Harbour was what pulled the Americans into the Second World War; if they hadn't of been attacked, the States probably would have continued their SOP for wars at that ear; sell to both sides and profit.That's not what I was arguing about at all. I'm saying Japan's war crimes were far worse than ours. I'm not saying that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were alright, but don't start getting all "Japan good; US bad" on me here. They killed, raped, and tortured far, FAR, more civilians than we ever did.
Post by
R1TeR
Anything goes when its war time
Japan started it U.S ended it
Post by
Adamsm
That's not what I was arguing about at all. I'm saying Japan's war crimes were far worse than ours. I'm not saying that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were alright, but don't start getting all "Japan good; US bad" on me here. They killed, raped, and tortured far, FAR, more civilians than we ever did.
Well.... as far as the books say.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skreeran
That's not what I was arguing about at all. I'm saying Japan's war crimes were far worse than ours. I'm not saying that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were alright, but don't start getting all "Japan good; US bad" on me here. They killed, raped, and tortured far, FAR, more civilians than we ever did.
Well.... as far as the books say.If you have a better source, by all means, present it. You can't deny Nanking and Unit 731, both horrible atrocities, and I find it rather offensive to suggest that the United States did worse.
Post by
denjerre
The idea of having nuclear weapons for 'defensive reasons' is ridiculous. They should destroy them all, to avoid war, death and destruction across Earth, which should be what everyone wants. Rocket shields, I can understand that, it only takes one man to destroy a country, and they have the right to be well-defended. About the U.S.A.; I think every country is as %^&*ed up as they are, but because they have the most influence on Earth, it shows more.
Post by
286251
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skreeran
That's not what I was arguing about at all. I'm saying Japan's war crimes were far worse than ours. I'm not saying that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were alright, but don't start getting all "Japan good; US bad" on me here. They killed, raped, and tortured far, FAR, more civilians than we ever did.
Well.... as far as the books say.If you have a better source, by all means, present it. You can't deny Nanking and Unit 731, both horrible atrocities, and I find it rather offensive to suggest that the United States did worse.
It's because we torture people monetarily lol. When you do this a person has to be reduced below their moral values, they'll be put into instiutions, their self esteem is shot, they look bad all the time, etc.Cause that's totally as bad as being thrown naked into the snow, having your frozen arms and legs cut off, and then being used for gas experiments.
Post by
364444
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
313143
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skreeran
Hi, I'm from Canada and went to dubai and i visited Iraq, Why not just leave them alone and return to you're homeland? less deaths= less money to spend lol?I wish we'd never gone there in the first place, honestly. But now that we're there and we've removed their previous government (not that Saddam didn't deserve it), if we just completely pulled out now, Iraqi society would be at risk of collapse and every person that died there would've died in vain.
Post by
313143
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
mindthegap5
Good on them xD. Don't mess with iran!
Post by
Patty
If you have a better source, by all means, present it. You can't deny Nanking and Unit 731, both horrible atrocities, and I find it rather offensive to suggest that the United States did worse.
I'm not going to say that the Americans were the only ones to do this, but...the blitz of Munich, Berlin and other cities is what they contributed towards. I know that Britain was completely bombarded, my grandparents and great-grandparents lived through it in the cities for pete's sake; but thousands of civilians killed, basically to prove a point? That doesn't sound like the noble Allies who defeated evil and oppression to me. Then, of course, the nuclear arms race.
Post by
Skreeran
If you have a better source, by all means, present it. You can't deny Nanking and Unit 731, both horrible atrocities, and I find it rather offensive to suggest that the United States did worse.
I'm not going to say that the Americans were the only ones to do this, but...the blitz of Munich, Berlin and other cities is what they contributed towards. I know that Britain was completely bombarded, my grandparents and great-grandparents lived through it in the cities for pete's sake; but thousands of civilians killed, basically to prove a point? That doesn't sound like the noble Allies who defeated evil and oppression to me. Then, of course, the nuclear arms race.I know, and Dresden as well. But we were the lesser of two evils when you consider Germany and Japan's war crimes.
Post by
denjerre
is sexually abusing people concidered warcrime if done in war?
Doubt it. I don't know the exact definition of a warcrime, but it's probably messing with your army.
Post by
313143
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.