This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Is Garrosh a definite Warchief?
Return to board index
Post by
Skreeran
Well, I disagree there. I believe Blizzard will try to make him better. I like Kirisani, and I don't think she would outright lie about it.
Whether or not we feel he actually earns his new respect is a matter of opinion, though. After all, some people thought the Lich King death cinematic was the most epic thing ever, but I was disappointed.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Seriously Taurenmoo, you must calm down. Only because he sees Thrall in a diferent way than you doesn't mean you have the right to say he is an idiot.
Also, Thrall may return as the Warchief after the Cataclysm and Deathwing have been dealt with. unless something happens (in before, I am NOT saying the Thrall might die).
You misjudge why I said it GVHB, it wasn't that he saw Thrall in a different way to me, its because he made some long winded statement about it, well clearly showing he knew jack about the character and just went on face value. Anyone else could see it, I just responded with a harsher tounge.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Well, I disagree there. I believe Blizzard will try to make him better. I like Kirisani, and I don't think she would outright lie about it.
Whether or not we feel he actually earns his new respect is a matter of opinion, though.
After all, some people thought the Lich King death cinematic was the most epic thing ever, but I was disappointed
.
your not the only one skee.
Post by
Adamsm
Rexxar is a true half-orcFix'd heh.
Post by
367020
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Well, I disagree there. I believe Blizzard will try to make him better. I like Kirisani, and I don't think she would outright lie about it.
Whether or not we feel he actually earns his new respect is a matter of opinion, though.
After all, some people thought the Lich King death cinematic was the most epic thing ever, but I was disappointed
.
your not the only one skee.
Far from the only one. Wrath started on a high note and then wasted that potential.
What would really make more sense for the increased hostility would be Black Dragonflight meddling. We've seen a number of them take on human form, and with Deathwing's brood, it would not be unexpected to see them stoking the fires of hatred between the two factions so Papa Neltharion can destroy them both.
That's what I've been thinking ever since they announced that Thrall is found 'captured' on a human ship; there are no Alliance level mages capable of handling Thrall(note it is true), so would make more sense for the Blacks to have something to do with it.
Post by
GVHB
Yeah, maybe some powerful Black Dragons gathered a group of humans (maybe some cultists from the Twilight Hammer) and captured Thrall just to weaken the relations between the two factions.
I could see the Black Dragonflight using that kind of strategy to make they enemies weaker.
Still, it doesn't seems that both factions are going to ally to fight Neltharion. They are up to themselves to recover from the cataclysm that almost destroyed the world.
This lead me to think, Will there be a faction that want to united the Alliance and the Horde to fight Deathwing? (much like the Argent Crusade did with the coliseum)
Post by
Haxzor
How could Thrall, who started the Horde, not be "Horde" enough?
Post by
sagnheiili
eh, i've just never seen thrall as a true horde leader. he's just.....always seemed neutral to me, knowing all about him, i know he built the horde and all.....but he just never seemed suited as leader of the horde.
it makes sense for him to be neutral now, IMO. garrosh is just doing what the horde should be doing as horde. and i read a blue post that implied that garrosh will not be a bad leader, that he will have changed into a better person come cataclysm.
can't find it though. he'll be a reckless leader, but i dont see him as corrupt, or ruining the horde. he'll grow up soon enough. I like him and see him as a true horde leader, unfortunatly more so than thrall, IMO.
Well, since Funden didn't want to say it, I'll gladly say so.
Your an idiot.
You seem to know jack about the lore, show your seeing things as face value, and fail to see the worth of such characters or what they do. Seriously, go develop some insight to the lore and THEN post on these threads. Even Darkton has done that.
You can't call someone an idiot when you use the wrong version of the word you're in the same sentence.
You are an idiot. Not your an idiot.
Post by
Monday
Well, since Funden didn't want to say it, I'll gladly say so.
Your an idiot.
You seem to know jack about the lore, show your seeing things as face value, and fail to see the worth of such characters or what they do. Seriously, go develop some insight to the lore and THEN post on these threads. Even Darkton has done that.
You can't call someone an idiot when you use the wrong version of the word you're in the same sentence.
You are an idiot. Not your an idiot.
I do believe it is
You're
an idiot. Who writes out You are anymore?
Post by
sagnheiili
Well, since Funden didn't want to say it, I'll gladly say so.
Your an idiot.
You seem to know jack about the lore, show your seeing things as face value, and fail to see the worth of such characters or what they do. Seriously, go develop some insight to the lore and THEN post on these threads. Even Darkton has done that.
You can't call someone an idiot when you use the wrong version of the word you're in the same sentence.
You are an idiot. Not your an idiot.
I do believe it is
You're
an idiot. Who writes out You are anymore?
You are being you're, and NOT being your.
Post by
Denkou
Well, since Funden didn't want to say it, I'll gladly say so.
Your an idiot.
You seem to know jack about the lore, show your seeing things as face value, and fail to see the worth of such characters or what they do. Seriously, go develop some insight to the lore and THEN post on these threads. Even Darkton has done that.
You can't call someone an idiot when you use the wrong version of the word you're in the same sentence.
You are an idiot. Not your an idiot.
I do believe it is
You're
an idiot. Who writes out You are anymore?
Either way is fine. Most people don't do it, but it's still grammatically correct. Just sayin' :P
Post by
92763
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
FarseerLolotea
/face palm I see another lock hitting this board soon.This.
Also: the trouble with Garrosh is not
just
about his aggression. It's partly that he went from sulking in Nagrand to being this blithering rageaholic in a split second...and partly because he has all of the common sense of a clefthoof in rut and would slurp pit-fiend blood in a heartbeat if someone told him it was an espresso.
Post by
374287
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
FarseerLolotea
Unfortunately it's not World of Peacecraft, so you've got to have your Garroshes and Varians for the storyline to work.War =/= PvP.
Post by
389990
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
374287
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
550363
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
ArgentSun
But it would ^&*! you off none the less. True I could maintain myself more and find other ways to express it.. but I guess playing wow for so long as taught me unless your direct, people won't listen. One of the great faults of online communities.
Direct does not mean insulting. Watch it.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.