This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
The new voiced over battle for undercity
Return to board index
Post by
Skreeran
Sigh...
What's the point of even bothering... I could spend half an hour composing a rebuttal, but Dark wouldn't listen anyway.
Post by
Monday
Sigh...
What's the point of even bothering... I could spend half an hour composing a rebuttal, but Dark wouldn't listen anyway.
Seriously Dark, who went in your soup? (and Taurenmoo doesn't count, he can't have #$%^ed you off this bad.)
Post by
Adamsm
You all should realize by now that even if he's shown a mountain of evidence, Darkton does not change his stance. So just give up the ghost, ignore his posts and continue the discussion, all your doing is feeding his need to nerdrage on things he does not like.
My my...
You prove that right all the time.
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
what we mean is that you're as close to a joke on this forums as u can come to be.
you swear upon your life that the forsaken experiment on children even when u have no evidence to suport this, and in case you didn't know my father is a farmaceutical, you know what they do when they experiment new drugs? they use them in ADULT specimens, because the dose needed to achieve a specific result isn't the same when used on a child, as such experimenting a drug or a toxin on a child isn't gonna yield any viable results.
the forsaken wanted a weapon to use in war, and to that end they wish to kill alliance soldiers with it, but here's the catch, the army of the alliance is not made up of children, is made up from adults, because of that, any experimentation on children is pointless, as the adecuate lethal dose for them is NOT the same as for an adult person.
don't question me on this boy as I got experience on this in real-life and u dont.
Test-results on smaller/younger specimens =/= test results on older/bigger specimens.
and that's a science proven fact, u're gonna argue against science now?
also, on ROTLK they never say she's a child, they say girl.
on war3, uther calls arthas "boy" several times, and does that makes arthas a child? nope, he's a 30 year old man.
likewise medivh calls jaina "girl" a few times, and does that makes her a child? nope.
stop with your ridiculus fride-logic, u're only making a fool of yourself (though that's not really hard if we think about it)
Post by
taurenmoo812
Honestly guys, you've told me to stop feeding the trolls but do the same. I've decided to just follow patty and adams advice now and just report 'certain' posters if they feel they want to wreck whatever thread I make now, your right, its the best thing to do.
Post by
313143
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
Pardon my French, but do any of you get sick of throwing good logic at an arrogant child?
what can i say? squashing fridge-logic is fun.
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
Pardon my French, but do any of you get sick of throwing good logic at an arrogant child?
Yes, yes I do.
he was refering to you darkton :P skreeran, addams, and myself have tried on this thread and many others to place some logic inside your skull, but you dismiss everything.
I mean u still insist taht the forsaken experimented on children without a single spec of proof.
so don't try to wash your hands of it and pretend we're talking about someone else, cuz we're all talking about YOU, who refuse to take logic when it's not in your side.
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
RotLK, in game quests, several RPs on her, ect.
what quests? care to link one?
ROTLK doesn't count, they say girl but that doesn't mean she's a child, didn't u read what I wrote above?
on war3, uther calls arthas "boy" several times, and does that makes arthas a child? nope, he's a 30 year old man.
likewise medivh calls jaina "girl" a few times, and does that makes her a child? nope
they don't say she's a child.
and no quest at all on the game mentions children.
you talk and talk but never link anything.
Post by
Orranis
he was refering to you darkton :P
Well no $%^&.
skreeran, addams, and myself have tried on this thread and many others to place some logic inside your skull, but you dismiss everything.
Assuming this is about the forsaken killing a kid, its you guys who just won't admit its a child.
Dude, I'm astounded by your logic here... Wait...
I mean u still insist taht the forsaken experimented on children without a single spec of proof.
RotLK, in game quests, several RPs on her, ect.
Hmmm... several quests you fail to link, several quotes you fail to produce to show this, and RPs are not lore. If I wrote a RP on To Kill a Mockingbird where they won the trial, would that mean they won the trial?
so don't try to wash your hands of it and pretend we're talking about someone else, cuz we're all talking about YOU, who refuse to take logic when it's not in your side.
This is in no way logic.
They get the benefit of the doubt. You have no proof of your claims, so you are simply assuming.
Post by
138638
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rankkor
well, you "could" make a Dk, that way u only have to lvl from 58 to 73, I do recomend you to do the horde version, it's not only longer, and more epic, but also you get to hear Sargeras Himself.
the alliance version is........ good enough, but far less epic.
do be warned that the youtube versions of both battles look terrible.
just put on the search-bar "Battle for the undercity (horde/alliance version)" and that's it.
it goes without saying that actually doing the battle is quite better than just reading it on wowwiki or watching it on youtube.
last but not least, you could wait for blizz to activate the PTR (Public Test Realms) for any future patches planned, on the PTR u can make a lvl 80 toon from the get-go, allowing you to do the battle without having to go through the process of leveling from 1 or 58 all the way to 73.
(then again, patch 3.3 was planned as the last major patch of wow, any future patches, if there are any, prolly won't require a PTR to test them, and cataclysm will have a beta wich is something not everyone will be able to obtain)
Post by
138638
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
138638
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Are you still responding to him? Seriously, cut it out, don't feed him.
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skreeran
sorry for double posting just finsihed seeing the videos they were indeed epic.
I now have an urge to kill Thrall and to camp undercity very nice voiceover and overall well doneAn urge to kill Thrall? Why? Thrall is one of the greatest orcs, or even people, that ever lived. Killing Sylvanas is one thing, but Thrall has only ever had good intentions.
And yes, it's pretty much a fact that the Horde version is more epic. Horde has you fight in the courtyard fight a boss, descend the elevators, go through the heart of the city, fight to the canals, fight a boss, fight to the throneroom, fight the guy who orchestrated the whole Wrathgate, hear Sargeras, and all to the tune of the Lament of the Sin'dorei.
Alliance has you fight in the sewers, fight a boss, run 5 feet to the Apothecarium, fight a pawn of Varimathras and then go yell at Thrall... I've done both, and I was very disappointed in the Alliance version.
Faction bias has very little to do with it.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.