This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
My idea involving eugenics
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
So 180,000,000 people killed by dictators/people in power isn't a problem? Governments supporting and allowing the petty criminals to run free isn't a problem? Etc. Etc.Dictators are a problem. We have to fight them with other ways.
You're ignoring my whole point.
My point is that you're saying that VANDALISM is more of a problem than mass murder, that druggies are more of a problem than drug lords, etc. And that's stupid.
KILLING OFF THE VICTIMS OF SOCIETY WILL DO NOTHING TO FIX THE SOCIETY.
Post by
438256
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Not all of them(referring to your broad generalization there), but like I said Victory, if this comes out, you have to volunteer for it... your just as bad as the 'poor unwashed masses'.I don't have to
volunteer
for it if I don't want. Sorry for broad generalization. Why am I bad? Because I want to help our societies?
And not all serials killers are sick... some of them just did it because
they were bored
and what have you.They are "sick" (this term needs definition) if they kill people just because they are bored.
Because you seem to think the only way to help is to sterilize a large portion of the world and leave the rich and middle classes as they are, when they cause far more damage to the world then the poor.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
They are "sick" (this term needs definition) if they kill people just because they are bored.
You want to kill people. And you're posting on Wowhead so you must be bored too. Hey, you must be sick!
Also:
KILLING OFF THE VICTIMS OF SOCIETY WILL DO NOTHING TO FIX THE SOCIETY.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
438256
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
I haven't seen dictators in western countries yet.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Such ignorance is such a small sentence.
that druggies are more of a problem than drug lords, etc. And that's stupid.
Drug lords exist because there are drug users.
Drug users exist because the drug lords bring them drugs. See it works both ways.
And since the drug lords are the one's controlling the whole system, they are naturally the ones that need to be taken out. If they are still around, the system is still around.
KILLING OFF THE VICTIMS OF SOCIETY WILL DO NOTHING TO FIX THE SOCIETY.
1. This wouldn't kill anybody
2. "Victims of society" .... It's their own fault that they didn't succeed in the society.
3. Some problems would be solved if there weren't any "victims of society"
1. Killing off is a term that means diminishing the population of a certain group. That's what you're doing.
2. No it's not.
3. If there were no more murder victims then there would be no murder problem any more. Just listen to yourself. This is some pretty idiotic bull$%^&.
And I think you're starting to get emotional with all caps and stuff.
Caps = shouting. I'm shouting at you. In your face. Logic doesn't work on you. Appeals to emotion don't work on you. The only thing left is making it as big and loud as possible so that maybe even just the tiniest bit penetrates your skull.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Because you seem to think the only way to help is to sterilize a large portion of the world and leave the rich and middle classes as they are, when they cause far more damage to the world then the poor.
I want to give an option to get sterilized for 1000€. I'd hope it would solve some problems in society. We need lower class to do some jobs, I wouldn't want all of them to get sterilized.
Well according to you; all poor people are stupid greedy SoB's so they'd all sign up for it that 1000 whatever currency that mark...... And that's more of your elitist crap, anyone can do a job... or maybe not, I can't see you ever doing the job of a plumber or a person who actually has to work for a living.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Such ignorance is such a small sentence.
I'm 17. Point me one dictator in western country from 1992-2009.
1) I don't give a flying #$%^ about your age -- it has no effect on your ignorance.
2) Why do you all of a sudden find the need to qualify your statement to the last 17 years? Did you remember Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, etc.?
3) Fidel Castro, Qadhafi Muammer Muhammed
Drug users exist because the drug lords bring them drugs. See it works both ways.
And since the drug lords are the one's controlling the whole system, they are naturally the ones that need to be taken out. If they are still around, the system is still around.
Drug lords didn't feed them the drugs and get them to start using.
Um, yes they do. Through middle men, yes, but they're the ones supplying the drugs.
1. Killing off is a term that means diminishing the population of a certain group. That's what you're doing.So giving all homeless person a home it means that you're killing them off?
That's relocating. Removing means of survival and/or propagation is killing off.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
I can call my experiment : Smart removal of society's problemsOr: The New combined works of the Nazi's and the Clan.
Post by
438256
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
The whole drug monopoly exists because people need drugs. Drugs lords, middle men and drug smugglers are there because of drug users, not the opposite.
You're running in circles.
There wouldn't bee a
need
without drugs in the first place. You can't be addicted to something that you don't have access to.
I-haven't-seen dictators in western countries yet.
You obviously haven't
seen
anything of this world. You're like a little kid with his hands over his ears yelling 'I can't hear you!'
Post by
Monday
I-haven't-seen
dictators in western countries yet.
So because you haven't
seen
them personally it means they don't exist? Sorry had to get that out there. Carry on
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
You're running in circles.
There wouldn't bee a need without drugs in the first place. You can't be addicted to something that you don't have access to.There wouldn't be any drug lords if nobody would start using.
If we clear one drug lord - someone's just going to replace him, and hard drug users always find a way to get drugs.
If were clear one druggie - someone's just going to replace him, and drug users always find a way to sell drugs.
You obviously haven't seen anything of this world. You're like a little kid with his hands over his ears yelling 'I can't hear you!'
Which means that you can't point one.
Epic fail.
So because you haven't seen them personally it means they don't exist? Sorry had to get that out there. Carry on
When I said "seen" - I meant that there hasn't been dictators in developed countries in the time I've lived, so they're not a problem in developed countries.
And what makes your measly short lifespan the measure for when dictators actually matter? There have been multiple dictators in power almost every year of the 20th century and you want to look at 8 of those years? You're not the center of the universe.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.