This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Sylvanas being 'evil'
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Her dad was his valet... and nothing, as if he said anything he probably would have been killed.
Post by
Skreeran
I doubt he knew. Taretha wouldn't want to worry him. I'm sure she promised him that that's what she wanted. I'm sure that Tammis would have killed Blackmoore himself when he found that he had her executred, at least if Thrall hadn't gotten to him first.
Post by
HiVolt
The only humans who are really made out to look like racist drunks in LotC are Blackmoore and his second in command (forget his name). About all of the other Humans are either noble, or just scared of the Orcs.
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
HiVolt
That's the guy. I mean, take Sergeant and Taretha as examples for nobility.
Post by
taurenmoo812
In fact, Grom was even more aggressive than Doomhammer, and he detested the killing of children.
He did?
You just proved how completely clueless and one sided you are in just about any debate you make in reguards to the horde Dark. You only ever take what you think you see and hear from surface material, well other people, even if they do or don't like it, actully find out stuff.
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Blood and Honour Joang.
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
has anyone read the book thats thats like lord of the clans but its about
tirion
i think hes quite the example of a great hero in that book knowing that he willingly got banished for lorderon for helping an orc
yeah Blood and Honor. I always liked the tale and showing how someone like Tirion could rise above all prejudices and recognise, regardless of race, when someone was noble or not. It would have gone against his true code of conduct that he never let go of.
Urm, though I think this thread has derailed some from the topic at hand.
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skreeran
In fact, Grom was even more aggressive than Doomhammer, and he detested the killing of children.
He did?
You just proved how completely clueless and one sided you are in just about any debate you make in reguards to the horde Dark. You only ever take what you think you see and hear from surface material, well other people, even if they do or don't like it, actully find out stuff.Hey, no need to be rude.
Post by
taurenmoo812
well yes but it was on topic with the offtopic so i threw it in
Well I don't mind a healthy debate, though less chance or arguments breaking out if it keeps to the subject matter, lol.
anyway. I'm in agreeance with Adam on the subject of Sylvanas in what comes after icecrown. By then she will have gotten her revenge on Arthas and what she will have been fighting towards will have come to an end. And despite Adams wish for Sylvanas to die in icecrown, we know that won't happen, from the onset of whats to come in cataclysm.
So, without Arthas to draw her anger towards, what will she aim at now. Obviously she would fight for her peoples survivial, but this attack on Gilneas, well perhaps unprovoked, is very inkeeping with what events of cataclysm, as in both sides taking whatever resources they can find and fighting over land and resources. I can bet you anything we're be hearing of alliance forces fighting and killing horde forces in them doing the same thing, so sylvanas could be in no more right or wrong then anyone here.
Hey, no need to be rude.
Yeah sorry skeeran, just his rip on doomhammer was unprovoked so I answered it.
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
well i think once arthas is dead. the forsaken&sylvannas will change for the better ((thats just my opinion cuz the forsaken are prety cool in my book no matter how screwed up they are))but im prety sure they will change i mean theyll still be dead
but that guy that killed them all will be dead so mabey a bit of happiness
I doubt it. Sylvanas messed up mind will focus on the next target and go for it with the same single minded ferocity she does after the Lich King, and the Forsaken will follow along behind as she gets them all killed for her insane ideal.
Post by
taurenmoo812
well i think once arthas is dead. the forsaken&sylvannas will change for the better ((thats just my opinion cuz the forsaken are prety cool in my book no matter how screwed up they are))but im prety sure they will change i mean theyll still be dead
but that guy that killed them all will be dead so mabey a bit of happiness
I would have liked to believe that myself.. but what was revealed about there attack on gilneas, I mean sure, Genn is an ahole who will probably be the alliance version of sylvanas in the long run, but as I think the forsaken are proven they would still use plague to attack those they consider a threat.. and this is after the wrath gate.
I doubt it. Sylvanas messed up mind will focus on the next target and go for it with the same single minded ferocity she does after the Lich King, and the Forsaken will follow along behind as she gets them all killed for her insane ideal.
lol, you really hate her guts don't you Adam. Its ironic her going from a hero of the alliance in tides of darkness to what she is now. But hell, I'm horde and even I don't like her actions.
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
well we really dont know the whole situation with gilneas yet so its too early to tell if there just busting in there to kill them
or if theres a real reason for all of this((wich im hoping for))
im one of those people thats begging to have them have a redemption
You mean, that maybe Genn and his werewolf army made a first attack on the forsaken and now the forsaken are fighting back?
Oooh I like this idea. Probably unlikely, but I like it.
Post by
Adamsm
I doubt it. Sylvanas messed up mind will focus on the next target and go for it with the same single minded ferocity she does after the Lich King, and the Forsaken will follow along behind as she gets them all killed for her insane ideal.
lol, you really hate her guts don't you Adam. Its ironic her going from a hero of the alliance in tides of darkness to what she is now. But hell, I'm horde and even I don't like her actions.
Aye I do.
well we really dont know the whole situation with gilneas yet so its too early to tell if there just busting in there to kill them
or if theres a real reason for all of this((wich im hoping for))
im one of those people thats begging to have them have a redemption
An interview with Chris Metzen, Metzen revealed that Sylvanas was ordered to move south into Gilneas because the Horde wanted a port in northern Lordaeron. Metzen mentioned that Sylvanas was "in the dog house" with the Horde after the Wrathgate events and has to move when the leadership of the Horde orders her to do so. That's why the Forsaken are pushing into Gilneas.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.