This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Garrosh fans?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
taurenmoo812
The fact remains...Garrosh is *in Garrosh's voice from the Ulduar trailer* a "TRUE Warchief."
Thrall is perfect for some nuetral faction that can eventually save the world....and bury 'old hatreds' .........and Garrosh...
Oh stop pulling the whole 'THIS IS
WAR
CRAFT MAKE IT WAR AND KILLIN AND ACTING DUMB' would ur. Why do ones like yourself even think theres a need for
More
warring in the plot when theres already that present?
Does having Thrall as the leader of the horde stop you going into AV, WSG, AB or Wintergrasp and killing alliance players for honor and marks? No, it doesn't stop the warring factions in having a leader who balances things out, but you being someone who doesn't seem to care for balancing things out, would throw everything else aside for a very thick headed promise of more pointless bloodshed, without any sign of a victor.
Are you someone who thinks, having a warchief that Garrosh would have the horde become the absolute victors in the war between both sides? Cause if you do, then you really are setting yourself up for a massive fall.
Garrosh sucks, his ideals suck, he wants to drag the horde down into the slime he faught to free itself off for years, and you'd gladly see that all undone for the promise of some raging, clueless thug? I don't care what you say about it, the War in warcraft isn't about what it once was, and trying to recapture that, it'll fail.
Post by
Monday
The fact remains...Garrosh is *in Garrosh's voice from the Ulduar trailer* a "TRUE Warchief."
Thrall is perfect for some nuetral faction that can eventually save the world....and bury 'old hatreds' .........and Garrosh...
Oh stop pulling the whole 'THIS IS
WAR
CRAFT MAKE IT WAR AND KILLIN AND ACTING DUMB' would ur. Why do ones like yourself even think theres a need for
More
warring in the plot when theres already that present?
Does having Thrall as the leader of the horde stop you going into AV, WSG, AB or Wintergrasp and killing alliance players for honor and marks? No, it doesn't stop the warring factions in having a leader who balances things out, but you being someone who doesn't seem to care for balancing things out, would throw everything else aside for a very thick headed promise of more pointless bloodshed, without any sign of a victor.
Are you someone who thinks, having a warchief that Garrosh would have the horde become the absolute victors in the war between both sides? Cause if you do, then you really are setting yourself up for a massive fall.
Garrosh sucks, his ideals suck, he wants to drag the horde down into the slime he faught to free itself off for years, and you'd gladly see that all undone for the promise of some raging, clueless thug? I don't care what you say about it, the War in warcraft isn't about what it once was, and trying to recapture that, it'll fail.
This ^
The world of Azeroth has already been torn apart by at least 32 years of war (from the moment the orcs stepped out of the dark portal to the beginning of Wrath of the Lich King). Does the world of Azeroth really need anymore fighting? By the beginning of WoW, the pact between the Horde and Alliance has all but evaporated, and the drums of war sound again, (WoW trailer, couldn't resist). If you look through all of the timeline of all the races, there has been several major conflicts from the Dark Portal, destroying several nations, clans, and peoples. While Thrall and Jaina were smart enough to try and make peace, several "other" *cough* Garrosh *cough* are too stupid. Think for a moment here. If your country has been at war for 32 years, wouldn't you like it to stop? For example, the war in Iraq has been going on for 7 years now (from 2002 IIRC) and people have been clamoring for years to stop fighting.
I think I have given you some stuff to think about. Now use your brain for it's intended function, which is to actually think, learn, and yes, your mind can change! Change it before we are swamped with stupid war mongers, who the only thing they can think is "lol I like fighting!1111!one!"
Post by
99382
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
HiVolt
Quick question to everyone saying that Garrosh would be more active:
So what makes you think that Garrosh will be any more
active
than Thrall has been? We have seen Thrall playing a vital part in more story and questlines than
any other
faction leader. What makes Thrall so
inactive
, that he needs to be taken from power?
What would lead anyone to think that if Garrosh would become Warchief, that he would be any more active than Thrall has been? You may argue that he's finally doing something about the Alliance threat... but then I have to wonder... what Alliance threat is there, exactly?
From what I've seen there has been no major push against the Horde from the Alliance; merely a declaration of hatred made by an anger-blinded Human King. We know that Garrosh won't resolve any of the Battleground conflicts, so that point is moot.
Look, I
want
war. I want it so badly,
I made a thread about it
. But what I
do not
want, is for the Horde to be taken over by a one-dimensional tyrant, who thinks he knows better than the person who has led his people for years, to prosperity I might add, while he was crying like a baby on Draenor.
Post by
99382
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
486927
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skreeran
Why is everyone saying he might be better in Catalsym?
He is going to murder Cairne for treason, in case you forgot.We don't know that, for one. We know Cairne is going away, but it's not confirmed that Garrosh is the cause.
As for we we think he'll be better in Cata is due to Kirisani's constant reassurance that the orc we saw attack Varian virtually unprovoked is not going to be our Warchief. She's said over and over that we don't know what will happen between now and Cata, and that Blizzard isn't going to ruin the Horde.
I'm still afraid that they will, but I trust them enough to believe what they say.
Edit: Here's the thread:
http://blue.mmo-champion.com/29/20140809141-why-garrosh.html
Post by
382219
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
99382
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
99382
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Confirmed on MMOchampion that Garrosh will kill Cairne.
It's still not confirmed, and if you don't have a link, don't say things like this, trying to stir up a board.
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Okay.... but again, without an actual link, you can suggest something, but don't say it's confirmed. I remember that thread, and they just took a part of the rumours that came out before Blizzcon and linked it, if you noticed, they cut it off right at the point where the crap about Thrall being guardian was posted.
Post by
Lands
Well first of all there would be no election for the Warchief, as many of you guys almost start to believe in this thread :)
Second, I don't know how about you, but I grew tired a looong time ago with such things as... lets say, an Isle of Conquest description, which says that a fierce battle for domination takes place there, and so on, and in the same time one can see Horde and Alliance walking in Dalaran or Shattrat together, or Thrall being extremely polite and diplomatic to Alliance.
It's like "well I kinda sent my Kor'kron to that Isle to eliminate your legions, Wrinn, but here in Argent Tournament Grounds I'll be doing my best to show you what a wonderful and polite guy I am, like nothing happen".
I mean, if they say we still have a war here, there is nothing wrong in a faction leader that behaves himself as a Warchief at war.
And after all, it's a game, so there's no need to compare npcs with american presidents, and personally I am glad about this fresh storyline in Alliance vs Horde conflict.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Confirmed on MMOchampion that Garrosh will kill Cairne.
It's still not confirmed, and if you don't have a link, don't say things like this, trying to stir up a board.
To late...
The only thing you linked there was something printed from the mmo champ rumor section someone else had linked. In other words, you didn't have anything to back it now anymore then before.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Well first of all there would be no election for the Warchief, as many of you guys almost start to believe in this thread :)
Second, I don't know how about you, but I grew tired a looong time ago with such things as... lets say, an Isle of Conquest description, which says that a fierce battle for domination takes place there, and so on, and in the same time one can see Horde and Alliance walking in Dalaran or Shattrat together, or Thrall being extremely polite and diplomatic to Alliance.
It's like "well I kinda sent my Kor'kron to that Isle to eliminate your legions, Wrinn, but here in Argent Tournament Grounds I'll be doing my best to show you what a wonderful and polite guy I am, like nothing happen".
I mean, if they say we still have a war here, there is nothing wrong in a faction leader that behaves himself as a Warchief at war.
And after all, it's a game, so there's no need to compare npcs with american presidents, and personally I am glad about this fresh storyline in Alliance vs Horde conflict.
You seem to have been mislead by the whole isle of conquest situation. Since most of the agression in northrend is based around Garrosh leading the warsong clan into such actions, the Kor'kron are part of that devision, and having to follow suit for it. Despite it, its still because of Garrosh ordering such a front, much like in icecrown, where both horde and alliance soldiers died pointlessly in a stupid conflict on Arthas front door.
And I cannot understand why so many players are crying late at night about there not being enough war in warcraft. Why do you think this? because the opposing faction city isn't being ransacked or burnt to the ground?
People who think like this are just going to have to get over the fact, that this isn't tides or darkness anymore, this isn't about one side trying to conquer well the other side trying to defend. Its now about both sides defending and conquering, one isn't overtly good or overtly bad anymore.
In other words, its become a blended soup, and someone like Garrosh won't give anything more then whats already there, if anything, he'll just fail as a leader and die as a raid boss.
Post by
99382
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
486927
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.