This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.5
PTR
10.2.6
Garrosh fans?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Hydralisk
I know there are plenty of Garrosh Hellscream haters out there and this thread is not for you... my question to the masses, are there any Garrosh Hellscream fans out there? *crickets*
There are plenty of threads to bash Garrosh elsewhere so please don't use this one to make the point that
Basic Campfire
would make a better Warchief, thank you.
I like the idea of Garrosh leading the Horde and (some may disagree) making it stronger, anyone else?
p.s. for the horde!
Post by
HiVolt
Good luck trying to keep people from bashing Garrosh in any thread about him.
I hate him. I hope he gets eaten by Deathwing.
Post by
taurenmoo812
I know there are plenty of Garrosh Hellscream haters out there and this thread is not for you... my question to the masses, are there any Garrosh Hellscream fans out there? *crickets*
There are plenty of threads to bash Garrosh elsewhere so please don't use this one to make the point that
Basic Campfire
would make a better Warchief, thank you.
I like the idea of Garrosh leading the Horde and (some may disagree) making it stronger, anyone else?
p.s. for the horde!
Pff, don't kid yourself.
I'm a horde vet and been dedicated to the horde for a long time now, as the spirit of the horde is reflected in not just its people but its leaders.
And why do you honestly thing Garrosh will make the horde stronger? Why do people have this misguided view? Its saying basicly that you think the horde is weak under Thralls leadership, which is just laughable sorry.
The horde is, as it stands now, the strongest it has ever been, and this is under Thralls leadership. The old, dark horde was weak in terms of it had no free will and just acted like rampaging savages, which lead to its ultimate defeat.
And Garrosh is a reflection of that old horde, don't try to pretend otherwise. He has all the hallmarks of something who would lead his people to pointless, stupid battles with only more pointless and stupid death.
Put it this way.
Thrall - George Washington
Garrosh - George Bush
Post by
Hydralisk
Good luck trying to keep people from bashing Garrosh in any thread about him.
I hate him. I hope he gets eaten by Deathwing.
I was hoping people could be civil, but i guess you proved me wrong right away.. thanks
Thrall - George Washington
Garrosh - George Bush *rollseyes* okay.. anyone else?
next can we call Garrosh the virtual Hitler?
Post by
Dwarfiesgosquish
Eh, not that I don't like Thrall... but i play WoW
to escape
from monotony, not to go into the throne room and see my leader sitting there.... like he has...since 2004..... and I don't think the horde will be
stronger
, but it will be fun to have a more militaristic leader for a change.
Post by
232137
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
chase123
Garrosh promise countless wars with the Alliance.
Garrosh promise tax cuts for
the rich
everyone.
Garrosh promise a gnome on every single dinner plate in Orgrimmar.
Garrosh for Warchief.
This is brought to you by The Old Horde Party. Garrosh/Magatha 2010
Post by
Valoras
next can we call Garrosh the virtual Hitler?
Ehhh.. No. Hitler was at least Intelligent. a bit misguided yes, but he was a Brilliant military leader.
If he hadn't had that little supremacy issue he would have been remembered VERY Differently.
Post by
161692
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Barkend
Garrosh is an idiot. And Blizzard maked a big mistake putting him as warchief. He will kick all the trolls, belf and undeads from Orgrimmar (I know, only the NPCs...). In most of the realms those 3 races are 50% of the horde population. And I'm not going to defend him from any alliance raid, like most of the other undeads, trolls and belfs players. And you know what that means? Alliance partys in the throne room every single day.
If Blizzard wants to make the horde more aggressive, they should make Nathanos Blightcaller the warchief. At least Nathanos is more clever and more strategist than Garrosh.
Post by
300134
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Good luck trying to keep people from bashing Garrosh in any thread about him.
I hate him. I hope he gets eaten by Deathwing.
I was hoping people could be civil, but i guess you proved me wrong right away.. thanks
How was he uncivil? He gave an honest opinion, it just wasn't the one you wanted to hear. Seriously, Garrosh is a %^&*!@, he was a whiny little dweeb in Nagrand, he decided that attacking the Warchief as a new scourge invasion started was a good idea, he was a royal idiot in Northrend, he picked a fight for no reason in Dalaran....... you really want someone like that leading the Horde?
Post by
276477
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Another point, which someone raised earlier, is despite hating the idea of Garrosh leading the horde, this does however open a chance to develop Thrall far more. As the released artwork depicts , it show Thrall and Cairne doing much more then just sitting in there respectec cities, they are acullty helping where they can in the cataclysm.
I just don't like the idea of my horde being lead by someone who gives all the horde bashers an actual reason to be right about calling them the bad guys. Thats what Garrosh will do.
Post by
469682
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Do you seriously think "Sourfang is warcheif and everyone is happy" is going to be a compelling storyline to experience?
Having some political strife will make the game more interesting, and Garrosh brings back the old horde spirit from Warcraft I & II
I mean come on its called WARcraft afterall.
Understandable, but at the same time, a very evil Dragon Aspect just riped Azeoth a new one just by waking up.
Is it really such a smart idea to start up more conflict with the Alliance when you've got a living apocalypse storming over the planet?
The world's resources are diminished, moral is probably really low, and as it looks like we'll have two very thick-headed people at the helms of both factions.
How hard is it to figure out how royally screwed we all are? Seriously, all Deathwing has to do is wait for Garrosh and Varien to destroy themselves and their factions, and the rest of the planet will be even easier to lay waste to.
Yes, it's called WARcraft. Yes, there is supposed to be some strife between the different factions. However, we have much bigger problems to worry about then petty squabbles.
This man speaks the truth. ^
Post by
363562
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
184848
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
I'm not saying Garrosh will be a better leader than Thrall, but I do think he will be a more interesting one. We all know what it is that Thrall wants and we all know that he's not going to get it anytime soon; we're at an impasse, a stalemate.
You think so? Thats funny because so far I've not found
anything
intresting about his character, from the whining emo in outland to the muscle headed moron in northrend, he just comes off as a background figure more then anything.
A friend I play with ingame, who isn't that big a lore fan but knows enough about horde and alliance conflict, when I was talking about how Garrosh was going to take control of the horde, she said 'Whos Garrosh?' (none jokingly either).
The
Only
thing that has anything to him is that he's the son of Grom, thats all.. if you take away that one detail he's just another thug.
Try to tell us anything else that makes him worthwhile to the horde, other then his rage issues.
Post by
HiVolt
I'm actually sorta a Garrosh fan, more like 65% Hate, 35% <3.
I don't like how he is throwing the Trolls out of Orgrimmar, but I do like how he takes more action then Thrall,
reckless and stupid actions
but... :P
This is my problem with Garrosh. Don't get me wrong,
I'm not one of the anti-war people
.
If you want a different Warchief who will mix things up a bit, why not put a vote in for
Nazgrel
?
From his WoWWiki article:
Nazgrel, the last son of Kash'drakor, was a raider of the Sythegore Arm who served under Thrall during the Invasion of Kalimdor. As a veteran of the Second War, loyal soldier of Orgrim Doomhammer, and a former prisoner of the Alliance internment camps,
Nazgrel despises the Alliance, and humans in particular. He views Thrall's continued insistence that the humans can be reasoned with to be a weakness, and feels that victory through war is the only way that the Alliance will end their persecution of the Horde.
However, Nazgrel is completely loyal to his Warchief, and thus does not act on his opinions.
The only difference between him and Garrosh is that Nazgrel actually has a respect for what the New Horde has become, and Thrall in particular. He knows the mistakes of using the Orc's Bloodlust in combat, and he's a
proven
tactical leader.
Other Bonuses: He's a Shaman, and a Frostwolf.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.