This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.5
PTR
10.2.6
Let's talk about seat belt laws
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Now what I want to see, is Hyperspacerebel, and TheMediator stuck in a room together. And see who comes out alive...
TheMediator. He'd eat me to stay alive QQ
;)
Post by
TheMediator
Now what I want to see, is Hyperspacerebel, and TheMediator stuck in a room together. And see who comes out alive...
TheMediator. He'd eat me to stay alive QQ
;)
I've been reading up on the subject about necessity as a defense for murder and its moral implications, and I've concluded the most ethical approach to filling my belly in such a situation is that I eat my own urine and feces until you die of starvation, after which I eat your corpse.
Heh.
Post by
124027
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
no government law, just the law of natural selection.
Enjoy flying through your own windscreen as you are hit from behind by a bad driver.
He means that smart people will wear their seat belts anyways, so all the not-smart people will get killed off.
Post by
TheMediator
Just stick with the urine. You only need to last long enough for one of you to die of dehydration.
It seems like it'd be such a shame to let all that chocolate go to waste.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Just stick with the urine. You only need to last long enough for one of you to die of dehydration.
It seems like it'd be such a shame to let all that chocolate go to waste.
It'll just make you thirstier.
lols
Post by
124027
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
393249
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
If you drive fast enough, this question becomes irrelevant.
I'd rather die from a snapped neck, not from skidding 50 yards down the pavement.
Post by
129077
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
383613
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skyfire
If you drive fast enough, this question becomes irrelevant.
This made me laugh.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
In the UK, each road traffic accident costs the taxpayer, on average, in excess of a million pounds (police, ambulances, tow trucks, scraping people off the roads, sticking them back together again, disability benefits, etc) and also damages the economy (insurance payouts, loss of earnings, etc.).
As long as I'm paying tax, you can wear a god damn seatbelt.
Seat belts in no way reduce the number of crashes.
Post by
383613
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
If you read my scenario they in fact do. The reason is that a seatbelt keeps you in your seat better and allows you to take sharper turns without flying around in your seat. I have been in numerous different occasions where simply wearing a seat belt has prevented an accident.
Summing up your
argument
earlier I got:
If you wear a seat-belt you can pull of slightly reckless moves more easily.
I don't think that's any basis for the claim that seat-belts prevent accidents.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.