This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.5
PTR
10.2.6
Forsaken thread
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
atkrei
i feel like it was nice of the forsaken to leave terenas's tomb place alone. and i think all the bad ones were wiped after the wrath gate
i wrote this a few posts ago.
Post by
Adamsm
I meant, his body isn't there Atkrei, the body was lost on the wind when Arthas poured the ashes out of the Urn to keep KT in one piece before they revived him as a Lich.
Post by
atkrei
the tomb then, they leave it there, instead of just getting rid of it somehow
Post by
Dralas
I wonder why Arthas didn't animate Uther...
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Dralas
He killed his father, raised others as damned, and had already slaughtered alot of people... I don't know what heart could have been left.
Post by
Adamsm
Nah, it was more important to move on and get KT revived, he was more or less just a pile of sludge by that point. And we all know Ner'zhul wanted KT alive and well more then he wanted a bunch of new death knights.
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Dralas
Nah, it was more important to move on and get KT revived, he was more or less just a pile of sludge by that point. And we all know Ner'zhul wanted KT alive and well more then he wanted a bunch of new death knights.
Still, you'd think Arthas would at least want more death knights instead of following some dreadlord so blindly.
Post by
atkrei
i remember reading that this dreadlord told arthas that he has to burn his fathers remains in order to resurrect kelthuzad i think, so it was either an extra scourge or kelthuzad for him. if he didnt he would be in a cr@p load of trouble
Post by
Dralas
I'm talking about Uther, not Arthas' farther.
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
atkrei
i remember reading that this dreadlord told arthas that he has to burn his fathers remains in order to resurrect kelthuzad i think, so it was either an extra scourge or kelthuzad for him. if he didnt he would be in a cr@p load of trouble
actually he needed the urn terenus remains were in to contain kt's ashes so he could ressurect him in the sunwell
forgot that part
Post by
Adamsm
Still, you'd think Arthas would at least want more death knights instead of following some dreadlord so blindly.Didn't have any choice, the legion still had full control of the Scourge at that point. They only got free after Archimonde went down.
Post by
389776
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Dralas
Still, you'd think Arthas would at least want more death knights instead of following some dreadlord so blindly.Didn't have any choice, the legion still had full control of the Scourge at that point. They only got free after Archimonde went down.
Ah.. forgot about that bit of info there. Still, he was given some will during his unholy crusade.
Post by
Adamsm
Yeah, but not enough to stop and focus more on reviving more DK as opposed to bring back the wizard who could read the spell book to open the gate so that Archimonde could come to Azeroth again, espically when said wizard is slowly turning into soup.
Post by
atkrei
what im writing is off topic of what everyone else is writing right now. but if there a few forsaken who still want the blight on the horde/alliance, everything will be found out at the attack on the icecrown citadel in the future
Post by
Dralas
What I never did figure out is how KT was able to communicate with Arthas, and only him, with everyone else unaware.
I know it was through his mind, I'm wondering where he got the power to do that while dead for so long.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.