This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
What do YOU think of the new mount changes?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Leduan
ARE YOU MAD !
Whats the point of playing anyway if you don't get the chance to do some Raids because you have a mount and questing is far more better,easier,more rewarding.
Where are the days of vanilla when you entered Orgrimmar on a Kodo and made the low levels follow you like puppies.
Who comes up with this changes ? (hope not the 3 year old's who also decide anything related to a hunter)
Post by
334295
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
SidheKnight
You're basically complaining about the game being less time consuming at earlier levels. Has the world gone topsy-turvy on me? /boggle
This!
I don't understand why people complain about benefical changes. Besides, people often lose sight of the bigger picture: level cap is rising.
This changes are great for altaholics like me!
Post by
301983
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
138311
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
39134
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
xcrunr1647
Still not good enough.
They should just start all subsequent alts at level 55 after you get your first level 80.
I hate you so much, Hillsbrad-and-STV.
/agree
Although I quite honestly enjoy world PvP. makes the leveling process oh-so-much more interesting.
Post by
330954
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
317210
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
204878
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Cyselnaar
Hello, I like the mount changes, despite the fact that I'm level 66 (flying mount) But now, where do warlocks and pallys go for their 'Improved quests?' My best guess would be: If warlocks have to go through an instance, I'd say SM and the cathedral section (or if blizzard needed magic to summon the dreadsteed) the library despite it's low level. But what about Pallys? My friend is inquiring a lot about this =P
Post by
170975
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
204878
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
328780
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
xaratherus
Now the regular mount skill is about 20 gold at lvl 20 which is extreamly easy to obtain and the epic mount skill is 50 gold! Can you belive it? Half the amount of what REGULAR was before... so don't come and tell us that it doesn't becomes easier.
Mounts should be something you earn, not a free speed boost to make stuff less tedious.
Pure opinion is pure.
I got my first mount when I was at 40 back before any of the mount changes. I didn't feel that I'd earned it, or that it was some sort of epic achievement - I just felt relieved that I was able to move at a decent speed finally.
Let me take a different track here. Blizzard is making these changes so that new players can more quickly level to access the new content. Assuming that this is their goal and it is not one that they will change, and that this is a "bad" change, what would you do instead? Simply saying, "Let them level at the speed I had to level," isn't a valid answer because it does not achieve their goal.
Post by
272357
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
328780
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
xaratherus
Yep, oppinions are often uniqe to people and I don't think it's fun when you can obtain a mount just as buying a snack and don't begin with this "If you don't like it, stop playing." because that's so unreasonable and just because I think they go easy mode with that doesn't mean I don't wanna play the game anymore, you don't need to take it to that kind of high lvl because that just turns out to this point when everything have to be perfect, but in my oppinion this changes is bull!@#$, but just for that I am not going to quit, BUT I am going to "QQ" about it, because I don't think this requires a challenge anymore.
If you could provide an answer to my question, by the by, it would be helpful. To restate it simply: Assuming that Blizzard will not alter their apparently goal (to get new players into the newest content in a shorter length of time), what changes would you suggest?
Complaining simply to complain will get you lambasted; you have the right to "QQ", but then again don't be surprised when people blast you for your complaints since you don't propose any alternatives.
As to requiring a challenge, by the way: How exactly? Since no one so far has been able to sufficiently prove that time equals difficulty (time equals tedium), then earning gold is not challenging in the slightest, even at low levels. If you had the patience, you could go the "South Park: Make Love, Not Warcraft" and simply kill a hundred thousand boars in Elwynn Forest.
Post by
328780
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
JDrive
I like any changes that help my alts get through the first 70 levels faster. Since that's pretty much when most played content begins. I remember how much it sucked getting enough gold for my regular mount at level 40 pre-bc.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.